[rs-dev] Release vote -- not quite there yet

[Dirk-Willem van Gulik]

> On 8 Dec 2019, at 00:48, Graham Leggett <minfrin at redwax.eu> wrote:
> 
> On 06 Dec 2019, at 16:04, Dirk-Willem van Gulik via rs-dev <rs-dev at redwax.eu> wrote:
> 
>> Grmpfh — the OpenSSL crowd does not quite internally agree on how to tackle this API issue - so I a going to wait for another 24-48 hours before asking for an 0.01 or a 1.00 (which I think is a fair) number release tag.
>> 
>> Secondly - objections if I create a ‘distribution-utils’ or some similar TLD in SVN - to keep my NixOS and FreeBSD ports code in ?
> 
> Does NixOS and FreeBSD need outside-the-tree definitions, or do they support inside-the-tree definitions?

You mean - if it is ‘foo-1.23/Makefile, etc’ or without the TLD name as you unpack the source. FreeBSD and NixOS do not care; but foo-1./23 is more natural.

> Currently we support both Debian and RPM inside-the-tree, but either is possible.
> 
> I’ve created a https://source.redwax.eu/svn/redwax/rs/rs-distribution repo that follows the pattern used by rs-manual. Will this be ok?

Ack !

Dw.